Q

What does the new USCIS policy memo mean for employment-based Adjustment of Status applicants?

A
The recent USCIS memorandum clarifies that Adjustment of Status (AOS) is a discretionary benefit, and consular processing abroad remains the standard method for obtaining permanent residence. From our experience, this means USCIS officers may exercise greater scrutiny on AOS applications, especially for employment-based categories like EB-1C and EB-5. However, the policy does not ban AOS or impose a formal requirement to consular process, but it signals a more cautious adjudication approach under 8 CFR §245.2.
Q

How should Chinese corporate executives and investors currently applying for AOS respond?

A
We recommend clients immediately verify their I-485 receipt notices and check USCIS processing times online. Strengthening the submission with clear evidence of eligibility, maintaining valid nonimmigrant status, and preparing for potential Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are critical. For those within EB-5 or EB-1C categories, if timing is flexible, considering consular processing at the U.S. embassy can avoid prolonged discretionary review delays. Our practical experience shows that switching to consular processing can shorten wait times by 3-6 months in some cases.
Q

Will this new policy affect pending AOS cases or only new filings?

A
USCIS has not issued explicit guidance on retroactively applying this policy to pending cases, but from our handling of recent RFEs, officers are increasingly citing discretion concerns. We advise clients with pending AOS to proactively submit supplementary evidence addressing discretionary factors, such as maintaining lawful status and employment continuity. If an AOS approval timeline is uncertain, planning for consular processing as a backup option is prudent.
Q

What concrete steps can applicants take now to minimize risk and delays?

A
First, ensure that all USCIS forms, particularly I-485 and associated I-140 or I-526 petitions, are thoroughly prepared with supporting documentation that anticipates discretionary scrutiny. Second, consult with legal counsel to evaluate whether consular processing might be a better strategic choice based on personal circumstances and current embassy appointment availability. Lastly, monitor USCIS announcements and use premium processing where applicable (e.g., I-140) to expedite underlying petitions, indirectly benefiting AOS timing. In summary, while this USCIS policy memorandum introduces a more cautious stance on Adjustment of Status, it also highlights an opportunity for applicants to reassess their immigration strategies. Being proactive, enhancing evidence, and considering consular processing can help corporate executives and investors navigate this evolving landscape with confidence. ---

Data Sources

[1] U.S. Department of State, travel.state.gov [2] USCIS, uscis.gov